Personally, I find it “the most amusing thing in the world”.
Singapore version of the crazy frog, its penis was censored. I’m too lazy to search from the internet for a censored version picture of the crazy frog.. but everyone here knows that, the Spore version crazy frog is one without a penis.
I don’t understand why they have to censor it. Look at this :
*
*
That’s the baboon from Spore Zoo. Everyone, young and old who visit the zoo CAN see its penis. And there’s nothing wrong about it. So?
The equation :
Baboon in the zoo = everyone can see = penis not “censored” (or, “sterilize”, whatever)
Crazy frog on tv = everyone can see = ?
So, crazy frog on tv should equals to “penis not censored” as well.
I know, I know, baboons are living creatures, crazy frog is not. We cannot just anyhow sterilize living creatures. But you see, if they allow the public to see a, not “a”, but dozens of “living” penises (baboons in the zoo are thriving strongly) in the zoo, what harm could it cause to see a none-living-penis?
If it does cause harm, then they should really cover up the baboons (as it’ll be too cruel to sterilize them all) or make them wear panties…………………………
Crazy frog just doesn’t feel right without his penis……
1 comment:
there is difference,some movie air on TV even showing the penis of little boy or baby. that is ok becuz that is what we see in our every day life.However, showing the penis of a cartoon character on air is different. If that is being encourage then then our kids will follow. Its cute any way. So in future you will see all the childents in the primary sch or pre-sch draw cartoon character of themself, their parent with penis expose during their art class. What do you think when such thing happen?
Post a Comment